[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170212.115012.462374721298882143.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:50:12 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gerlitz.or@...il.com
Cc: ogerlitz@...lanox.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
amir@...ai.me, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
paulb@...lanox.com, roid@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/sched: Use TC skip flags to reflect
HW offload status
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:54:25 +0200
> Re the old kernel argument, these patches are small and pointish,
> would it make sense to you to consider them as fixes and push them
> back to the relevant stable kernels?
Sorry, it doesn't work that way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists