[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1486928573-24773-20-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:42:51 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 19/21] netfilter: nf_tables: add NFTA_RULE_ID attribute
This new attribute allows us to uniquely identify a rule in transaction.
Robots may trigger an insertion followed by deletion in a batch, in that
scenario we still don't have a public rule handle that we can use to
delete the rule. This is similar to the NFTA_SET_ID attribute that
allows us to refer to an anonymous set from a batch.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 3 +++
include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 ++
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
index 21ce50e6d0c5..ac84686aaafb 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -1202,10 +1202,13 @@ struct nft_trans {
struct nft_trans_rule {
struct nft_rule *rule;
+ u32 rule_id;
};
#define nft_trans_rule(trans) \
(((struct nft_trans_rule *)trans->data)->rule)
+#define nft_trans_rule_id(trans) \
+ (((struct nft_trans_rule *)trans->data)->rule_id)
struct nft_trans_set {
struct nft_set *set;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
index 207951516ede..05215d30fe5c 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ enum nft_chain_attributes {
* @NFTA_RULE_COMPAT: compatibility specifications of the rule (NLA_NESTED: nft_rule_compat_attributes)
* @NFTA_RULE_POSITION: numeric handle of the previous rule (NLA_U64)
* @NFTA_RULE_USERDATA: user data (NLA_BINARY, NFT_USERDATA_MAXLEN)
+ * @NFTA_RULE_ID: uniquely identifies a rule in a transaction (NLA_U32)
*/
enum nft_rule_attributes {
NFTA_RULE_UNSPEC,
@@ -218,6 +219,7 @@ enum nft_rule_attributes {
NFTA_RULE_POSITION,
NFTA_RULE_USERDATA,
NFTA_RULE_PAD,
+ NFTA_RULE_ID,
__NFTA_RULE_MAX
};
#define NFTA_RULE_MAX (__NFTA_RULE_MAX - 1)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 71c60a04b66b..6c782532615f 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -240,6 +240,10 @@ static struct nft_trans *nft_trans_rule_add(struct nft_ctx *ctx, int msg_type,
if (trans == NULL)
return NULL;
+ if (msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWRULE && ctx->nla[NFTA_RULE_ID] != NULL) {
+ nft_trans_rule_id(trans) =
+ ntohl(nla_get_be32(ctx->nla[NFTA_RULE_ID]));
+ }
nft_trans_rule(trans) = rule;
list_add_tail(&trans->list, &ctx->net->nft.commit_list);
@@ -2293,6 +2297,22 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
return err;
}
+static struct nft_rule *nft_rule_lookup_byid(const struct net *net,
+ const struct nlattr *nla)
+{
+ u32 id = ntohl(nla_get_be32(nla));
+ struct nft_trans *trans;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(trans, &net->nft.commit_list, list) {
+ struct nft_rule *rule = nft_trans_rule(trans);
+
+ if (trans->msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWRULE &&
+ id == nft_trans_rule_id(trans))
+ return rule;
+ }
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+}
+
static int nf_tables_delrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
const struct nlattr * const nla[])
@@ -2331,6 +2351,12 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
return PTR_ERR(rule);
err = nft_delrule(&ctx, rule);
+ } else if (nla[NFTA_RULE_ID]) {
+ rule = nft_rule_lookup_byid(net, nla[NFTA_RULE_ID]);
+ if (IS_ERR(rule))
+ return PTR_ERR(rule);
+
+ err = nft_delrule(&ctx, rule);
} else {
err = nft_delrule_by_chain(&ctx);
}
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists