[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLgUsPDL0wbuHk5RaehzJ+TRLQ=WkVBMTB65scrEjO3Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:29:18 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 08/14] mlx4: use order-0 pages for RX
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Odds are for a single TCP flow you won't notice. This tends to be
> more of a small packets type performance issue. If you hammer on he
> Rx using pktgen you would be more likely to see it.
>
> Anyway patch looks fine from a functional perspective so I am okay
> with it. The page count bulking is something that can be addressed
> later.
Well, if we hammer enough, pages are not recycled because we cycle
through RX ring buffer too fast.
This might be different for PowerPC though, because of its huge PAGE_SIZE.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists