netdev - Re: [patch net-next] net: qcom/emac: fix a sizeof() typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:28:50 +0100
From:   walter harms <wharms@....de>
To:     Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
CC:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: qcom/emac: fix a sizeof() typo



Am 13.02.2017 14:03, schrieb Timur Tabi:
> walter harms wrote:
>> We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ?
>>
>> emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly
>> easy to
>> move that into that function.
>>
>> @maintainer:
>> Is there a deeper logic behind this ?
> 
> I don't understand the question.


The question is: why is a simple calculation const*const
separated into a function ?

re,
 wh