lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:28:50 +0100 From: walter harms <wharms@....de> To: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: qcom/emac: fix a sizeof() typo Am 13.02.2017 14:03, schrieb Timur Tabi: > walter harms wrote: >> We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ? >> >> emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly >> easy to >> move that into that function. >> >> @maintainer: >> Is there a deeper logic behind this ? > > I don't understand the question. The question is: why is a simple calculation const*const separated into a function ? re, wh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists