[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170214235954.xhuikgj4bbfjq7fv@tha-monstah.mydomain>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:59:55 -0600
From: Marty Plummer <netz.kernel@...il.com>
To: Dongpo Li <lidongpo@...ilicon.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yisen.zhuang@...wei.com,
salil.mehta@...wei.com
Subject: Re: net: hix5hd2_gmac uninitialized net_device
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:25:38AM +0800, Dongpo Li wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/2/11 8:51, Marty Plummer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:21:35PM +0800, Dongpo Li wrote:
> >> I think the error "No irq resource" happened for some other reason, has no relation with
> >> the info "(unnamed net_device) (uninitialized):".
> >> You can add more debug info to find bug.
> > Do you have any particular suggestions as to what to check out, or is
> > this just a general 'debug more' instruction?
> I haven't encountered such a problem. So it needs you to debug what happens.
>
Yes, I've figured out the origin here. It was user error, in that I was
not nesting the device node under the soc node, which had the
interrupt-parent property. Moving it there fixed that issue.
In any case, I've ran into another problem. Basic gist is, I was giving
it a go on my hi3521a board, because reading the registers for that and
comparing it to the source, I find they are nearly bit-for-bit
identical, but I suppose there is some tweakage needed to make it work
100%.
What information would it take to have this driver expanded to enable a
new, similar SoC?
>
> Regards,
> Dongpo
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists