[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7875566-efa3-ba75-2699-3866a091615c@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:18:41 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net] bpf: add bpf_sk_netns_id() helper
On 2/15/17 8:08 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> writes:
>
>> On 2/14/17 12:21 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>> in cases where bpf programs are looking at sockets and packets
>>>> that belong to different netns, it could be useful to get an id
>>>> that uniquely identify a netns within the whole system.
>>> It could be useful but there is no unique namespace id.
>>>
>>
>> Have you given thought to a unique namespace id? Networking tracepoints
>> for example could really benefit from a unique id.
>
> An id from the perspective of a process in the initial instance of every
> namespace is certainly possible.
>
> A truly unique id is just not maintainable. Think of the question how
> do you assign every device in the world a rguaranteed unique ip address
> without coordination, that is routable. It is essentially the same
> problem.
>
> AKA it is theoretically possible and very expensive. It is much easier
> and much more maintainable for identifiers to have scope and only be
> unique within that scope.
I don't mean unique in the entire world, I mean unique within a single
system.
Tracepoints are code based and have global scope. I would like to be
able to correlate, for example, FIB lookups within a single network
namespace. Having an id that I could filter on when collecting or match
when dumping them goes a long way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists