netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move ATU code in its own file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fujcmqj9.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:54:50 -0500
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move ATU code in its own file

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:

> This seems to be more than renaming a few functions. There looks to be
> real changes here. I think these changes should be split out into a
> separate patch with an explanation what is being changed. Keep this
> patch for plain renames.
>
> It would also be easier to review if the patch just moved the code, no
> changes. Then have patches which clean up the API. It is hard to see
> what is move and what is cleanup. Plain move needs little review,
> cleanup needs more review. With the current patch, it is hard to see
> which is which.

I understand your concerns about that. I've started that way (just
moving code) but this ended up messier because of the naming convention
which would required renaming and more diffstats. I found it actually
easier to review the new code at once by reading all the addition block.

Note that we are very close from 4.10, so unless there is a major issue
in the patchset, I'd prefer not to respin new versions. I'd gladly send
cosmetics fixup later though. I'm waiting for this patchset to land in
net-next to send the second one ready for cross-chip bridging in DSA.

Thanks,

        Vivien