netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] virito-net: set queues after reset during xdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58A787AB.6000201@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:30:51 -0800
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virito-net: set queues after reset during
 xdp_set

On 17-02-16 09:10 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017年02月17日 12:53, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 17-02-15 01:08 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> We set queues before reset which will cause a crash[1]. This is
>>> because is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue() depends on the old xdp queue pairs
>>> number to do the correct detection. So fix this by:
>>>
>>> - set queues after reset, to keep the old vi->curr_queue_pairs. (in
>>>    fact setting queues before reset does not works since after feature
>>>    set, all queue pairs were enabled by default during reset).
>>> - change xdp_queue_pairs only after virtnet_reset() is succeed.
>>>
>>> [1]
>> I'm guessing this occurs when enabling XDP while receiving lots of traffic?
> 
> I hit this then disabling XDP while receiving lots of traffic.
> 

[...]

>>> +        vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
>> But xdp_queue_pairs is being used to detect if we should allocate the XDP
>> headroom. If we move it here do we have a set of buffers in the ring without
>> the proper headroom when we assign the xdp program below?
> 
> Right, so how about passing xdp_queue_pairs as a parameter to virtnet_reset().
> Then virtnet_reset() can set it after _remove_vq_common() but before
> virtnet_restore_up()?
> 
> Thanks
> 

Sounds like a reasonable fix to me.

>>
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    err = _virtnet_set_queues(vi, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
>>> +    if (err) {
>>> +        dev_warn(&dev->dev, "XDP Device queue allocation failure.\n");
>>> +        goto virtio_queue_err;
>>>       }
>>>         netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
>>> @@ -1844,17 +1844,18 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev,
>>> struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>         return 0;
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>