netdev - Re: [PATCH net v5] bpf: add helper to compare network namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:15:11 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net
CC:     ast@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, luto@...capital.net,
        ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5] bpf: add helper to compare network namespaces

On 02/17/2017 05:01 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/16/17 3:08 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> Is there anything that speaks against doing the comparison itself
>> outside of the helper? Meaning, the helper would get a buffer
>> passed from stack f.e. struct foo { u64 ns_dev; u64 ns_ino; }
>> and fills both out with the netns info belonging to the sk/skb.
>
> How do you handle CONFIG_NET_NS not set?
>
> You call something like bpf_get_netns_id(sk, &foo), it has to exist
> regardless of the config. What should it return if netns is disabled?

In rough semi pseudo code, it could look like the below. In case we have
!CONFIG_NET_NS then that would be hidden behind the netns_get_kstat() (or
whatever function name it has) as a static inline that just returns an
error such as -ENOTSUPP.

If the entity installing the program is aware that CONFIG_NET_NS is set
and that the input is exactly of size struct bpf_netns, then it can also
skip the error test in the BPF program itself. Anyway, just a thought
so that the helper could be more flexible and used as a key for lookups
on maps, too ...

BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sk_netns_get, struct sock *, sk,  struct bpf_netns *, ns,
            u32, size)
{
         struct ns_kstat tmp;
         int ret;

         if (unlikely(size != sizeof(struct bpf_netns)))
                 return -EINVAL;

         ret = netns_get_kstat(sock_net(sk), &tmp);
         if (unlikely(ret))
                 return ret;

         ns->dev = tmp.dev;
         ns->ino = tmp.ino;

         return 0;
}

static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_netns_get_proto = {
         .func           = bpf_sk_netns_get,
         .gpl_only       = false,
         .ret_type       = RET_INTEGER,
         .arg1_type      = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
         .arg2_type      = ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
         .arg3_type      = ARG_CONST_SIZE,
};

Thanks,
Daniel