[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170218003929.zno356wjwlys4mqv@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 08:39:30 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sagi@...mberg.me, kbuild-all@...org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/utils: fix semicolon.cocci warnings
Hi Dave,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:52:54PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 05:34:03 +0800
>
>> net/core/utils.c:388:2-3: Unneeded semicolon
>>
>>
>> Remove unneeded semicolon.
>>
>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci
>>
>> CC: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> utils.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- a/net/core/utils.c
>> +++ b/net/core/utils.c
>> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int inet_pton_with_scope(struct net *net
>
>I have no idea what tree this could be against, as net/core/utils.c doesn't
>have more than 351 lines in any tree I maintain.
You can ignore it -- the cocci fix is for Sagi Grimberg's RFC patch
which can be judged by looking at the thread:
Feb 17 To Sagi Grimber ( 22:0) -->Re: [PATCH rfc 1/4] net/utils: generic inet_pton_with_scope helper
Feb 17 To Sagi Grimber ( 29:0) `->[PATCH] net/utils: fix semicolon.cocci warnings
Thanks,
Fengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists