netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next 0/3] iplink: add support for link xstats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170218163843.17f6c4f6@xeon-e3>
Date:   Sat, 18 Feb 2017 16:38:43 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next 0/3] iplink: add support for link
 xstats

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:23:10 +0100
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> This set adds support for printing link xstats per link type. Currently
> only the bridge and its ports support such call and it dumps the mcast
> stats. This model makes it easy to use the same callback for both bridge
> and bridge_slave link types. Patch 01 also updates the man page with the
> new xstats link option and you can find an example in patch 02's commit
> message.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Nik
> 
> 
> Nikolay Aleksandrov (3):
>   iplink: add support for xstats subcommand
>   iplink: bridge: add support for displaying xstats
>   iplink: bridge_slave: add support for displaying xstats
> 
>  ip/Makefile              |   2 +-
>  ip/ip_common.h           |  12 +++-
>  ip/iplink.c              |   5 ++
>  ip/iplink_bridge.c       | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  ip/iplink_bridge_slave.c |   2 +
>  ip/iplink_xstats.c       |  81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  man/man8/ip-link.8.in    |  12 ++++
>  7 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 ip/iplink_xstats.c
> 

Applied thanks. There was some minor fuzz on first batch due to other changes.