netdev - Re: [PATCH net 00/10] qed*: Bug fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170220.154000.195323599467695349.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:40:00 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 00/10] qed*: Bug fixes

From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:14:17 +0000

>  > > Hi Dave,
>> >
>> > The 3 first patches here are a repost of
>> > ("qed: RoCE infrastructure fixes"). The fourth is an additional
>> > RoCE-related infrastructure fix, and the latter contain various fixes
>> > to qed/qede.
>> >
>> > Notice patch #10 will create a conflict when net and net-next would be
>> > merged [although its fix is quite trivial].
>> >
>> > Please consider applying these to `net'.
>> 
>> Linus made his release so all patches are going into net-next, which this
>> series doesn't apply cleanly to.  Please therefore respin your series against
>> net-next, thanks.
> 
> Just to clarify - do you want me to re-spin the fixes against next-next *now*,
> or do you want me to wait until it re-opens? [not sure on its exact state]

Yes, now.