[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1487668159-4720-1-git-send-email-fgao@ikuai8.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:09:19 +0800
From: fgao@...ai8.com
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, soheil@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gfree.wind@...il.com
Cc: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: sock: Use USEC_PER_SEC macro instead of literal 1000000
From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
The USEC_PER_SEC is used once in sock_set_timeout as the max value of
tv_usec. But there are other similar codes which use the literal
1000000 in this file.
It is minor cleanup to keep consitent.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
---
v2: Use DIV_ROUND_UP, per Joe Perches
v1: Initial version
net/core/sock.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 8b35debf..e2f7abd 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int sock_set_timeout(long *timeo_p, char __user *optval, int optlen)
if (tv.tv_sec == 0 && tv.tv_usec == 0)
return 0;
if (tv.tv_sec < (MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT/HZ - 1))
- *timeo_p = tv.tv_sec*HZ + (tv.tv_usec+(1000000/HZ-1))/(1000000/HZ);
+ *timeo_p = tv.tv_sec * HZ + DIV_ROUND_UP(tv.tv_usec, USEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
return 0;
}
@@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
v.tm.tv_usec = 0;
} else {
v.tm.tv_sec = sk->sk_rcvtimeo / HZ;
- v.tm.tv_usec = ((sk->sk_rcvtimeo % HZ) * 1000000) / HZ;
+ v.tm.tv_usec = ((sk->sk_rcvtimeo % HZ) * USEC_PER_SEC) / HZ;
}
break;
@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
v.tm.tv_usec = 0;
} else {
v.tm.tv_sec = sk->sk_sndtimeo / HZ;
- v.tm.tv_usec = ((sk->sk_sndtimeo % HZ) * 1000000) / HZ;
+ v.tm.tv_usec = ((sk->sk_sndtimeo % HZ) * USEC_PER_SEC) / HZ;
}
break;
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists