lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALzJLG9iEgw3ziiGnUWvhazPjge02AfKPXaRt1cq+yh28VacMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:37:46 +0200
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/6] net/mlx5e: Do not reduce LRO WQE size when not
 using build_skb

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
>> From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
>>
>> When rq_type is Striding RQ, no room of SKB_RESERVE is needed
>> as SKB allocation is not done via build_skb.
>>
>> Fixes: e4b85508072b ("net/mlx5e: Slightly reduce hardware LRO size")
>> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>
> why this one is a bug fix?
> Sound like an optimization from commit log.

It is a regression since  ("net/mlx5e: Slightly reduce hardware LRO size").
And we see due to this a small drop in HW LRO performance.
We just fixed the LRO size to be the same as it was before the
offending patch for striding RQ case.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ