netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mwifiex: wake system up when receives a wake irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58B02527.6090400@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:20:55 +0800
From:   jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC:     Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mwifiex: wake system up when receives a wake irq

Hi Kalle,

On 02/24/2017 07:01 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com> writes:
>
>> Currrently we are disabling this wake irq after receiving it. If this
>> happens before we finish suspend and the pm event check is disabled,
>> the system will continue suspending, and this irq would not work again.
>>
>> We may need to abort system suspend to avoid that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
> I only see patch 3 in patchwork. Where are patches 1 and 2?
>


the other two are much like this one, but for bluetooth :)

please check:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9589455 New          [1/3] btusb: 
wake system up when receives a wake irq
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9589453 New          [2/3] btmrvl: 
wake system up when receives a wake irq
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9589457 New          [3/3] mwifiex: 
wake system up when receives a wake irq



(sorry, this is a resent mail, because the last one was rejected due to 
wrong format)