netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] color: use "light" colors for dark background

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170224.102817.1987967741498252394.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:28:17 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     pvorel@...e.cz
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, m.nyman@....fi, yegorslists@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] color: use "light" colors for dark background

From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:13:12 +0100

> COLORFGBG environment variable is used to detect dark background.
> 
> Idea and a bit of code is borrowed from Vim, thanks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
> ---
> Colors are nice, but the ones chosen aren't suitable for dark background.
> COLORFGBG environment variable is used in some libraries and software (e.g.
> ncurses, Vim). COLORFGBG is set by various terminal emulators (e.g. konsole,
> rxvt and rxvt-unicode).
> 
> Chosen colors are questionable. Best solution would be also allow user to
> redefine colors, like ls does with LS_COLORS or grep with GREP_COLORS. But that
> is maybe overkill.

I think you may have posted this to the wrong mailing list.