netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] color: use "light" colors for dark background

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170224085020.482109b0@xeon-e3>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:50:20 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     johannes@...solutions.net, pvorel@...e.cz, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        m.nyman@....fi, yegorslists@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] color: use "light" colors for dark background

On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:22:13 -0500 (EST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:11:42 +0100
> 
> >   
> >> > Chosen colors are questionable. Best solution would be also allow  
> >> user to  
> >> > redefine colors, like ls does with LS_COLORS or grep with  
> >> GREP_COLORS. But that  
> >> > is maybe overkill.  
> >> 
> >> I think you may have posted this to the wrong mailing list.  
> > 
> > Actually, it seems to just be missing the "iproute" (or so) prefix?  
> 
> Ok that makes more sense :)

Yes. Iproute2 has  had color support for a while.
The CC list has the original developer