[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05afcb95-6dd5-753a-ccb3-fe12d5746ffa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:06:49 -0800
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv6: check for ip6_null_entry in
__ip6_del_rt_siblings()
On 2/27/17 1:04 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>> for (rt = fn->leaf; rt; rt = rt->dst.rt6_next) {
>> + /* do not allow deletion of the null route */
>> + if (rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry)
>> + continue;
>>
>> Fixes: 0ae8133586ad net: ipv6: Allow shorthand delete of all nexthops in
>> multipath route
>
> Note, I moved the check into __ip6_del_rt_siblings() because __ip6_del_rt()
> has a same check.
>
that's b/c __ip6_del_rt has a second call path. __ip6_del_rt_siblings is
new and is not expecting to see the null entry. Catching it before the
dst_hold would be better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists