[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1488210774.25838.6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:52:54 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...labora.com>,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, stas.yakovlev@...il.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/20] checkpatch: warn for use of old PCI pool API
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 13:52 +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> > I also wonder if you've in fact converted all of the
> > pci_pool struct and function uses why a new checkpatch
> > test is needed at all.
>
> That's just to avoid futures mistakes/uses.
When all instances and macro definitions are removed
the check is pointless as any newly submitted patch
will not compile.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists