[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1488320630.25838.39.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:23:50 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
"eugenia@...lanox.com" <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
"dan.carpenter@...cle.com" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"yishaih@...lanox.com" <yishaih@...lanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] net/mlx4: && vs & typo
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 15:35 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 15:02 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Bitwise & was obviously intended here.
[]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mlx4/driver.h b/include/linux/mlx4/driver.h
[]
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static inline void (u8 *addr, u64 mac)
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = ETH_ALEN; i > 0; i--) {
> > - addr[i - 1] = mac && 0xFF;
> > + addr[i - 1] = mac & 0xFF;
> > mac >>= 8;
> > }
> > }
>
> Is this the only place where such a loop occurs?
Seems to be.
> Should a put_unaligned_be48()
> function be introduced?
Why? This is used exactly once.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists