netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/12] socket sendmsg MSG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrVQj1AEsLEGGkWW1zApGz6_x2rDmE0wz4ft+O5h07f_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:25:31 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/12] socket sendmsg MSG_ZEROCOPY

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:09 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> Does this mean that a user program that does a zerocopy send can cause
>> a retransmitted segment to contain different data than the original
>> segment?  If so, is that okay?
>
> Same remark applies to sendfile() already

True.

>, or other zero copy modes
> (vmsplice() + splice() )

I hate vmsplice().  I thought I remembered it being essentially
disabled at some point due to security problems.

>