netdev - Re: net/rds: use-after-free in inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bWWAiMYQN_Fvxs7CKR9hRAA+r0t_YZhja3B5xGcZ4vcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:32:57 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Cc:     santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        rds-devel@....oracle.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net/rds: use-after-free in inet_create

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Sowmini Varadhan
<sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com> wrote:
> On (02/28/17 16:49), Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>
>> Grepping "socket" there, it was doing lots of things with sockets. Are
>> we looking for some particular socket type? If there are few programs
>> that create sockets of that type, then we can narrow down the set:
>
> Yes, we are looking for PF_RDS/AF_RDS - this should be
> #define AF_RDS          21      /* RDS sockets                  */
>
> I see PF_KCM there (value 41) but no instances of 0x15.. how did
> the rds_connect_worker thread get kicked off at all?
>
> the way this is supposed to work is
> 1. someone modprobes rds-tcp
> 2. app tries to do rds_sendmsg to some ip address in a netns - this triggers the
>    creation of an rds_connection, and subsequent kernel socket TCP connection
>    threads (i.e., rds_connect_worker) for that netns
> 3. if you unload rds-tcp, the module_unload should do all the cleanup
>    needed via rds_tcp_conn_paths_destroy. This is done
> Its not clear to me that the test is doing any of this...
>
> is this reproducible? let me check if there is some race window where
> we can restart a connection attempt when rds_tcp_kill_sock assumes
> that the connect worker has been quiesced..


Not reproducible so far.

rds is compiled into kernel (no modules):
CONFIG_RDS=y
CONFIG_RDS_TCP=y

Also fuzzer actively creates and destroys namespaces.

Yes, I don't see socket(0x15) in the log. Probably it was truncated.