netdev - [PATCH 2/3] xfrm: Don't use sk_family for socket policy lookups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2017 07:57:27 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] xfrm: Don't use sk_family for socket policy lookups

On IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses sk_family is AF_INET6,
but the flow informations are created based on AF_INET.
So the routing set up 'struct flowi4' but we try to
access 'struct flowi6' what leads to an out of bounds
access. Fix this by using the family we get with the
dst_entry, like we do it for the standard policy lookup.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 3c8f5b7..a9af17f 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ static inline int policy_to_flow_dir(int dir)
 }
 
 static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
-						 const struct flowi *fl)
+						 const struct flowi *fl, u16 family)
 {
 	struct xfrm_policy *pol;
 
@@ -1256,8 +1256,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
  again:
 	pol = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_policy[dir]);
 	if (pol != NULL) {
-		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl,
-						 sk->sk_family);
+		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl, family);
 		int err = 0;
 
 		if (match) {
@@ -2253,7 +2252,7 @@ struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
 	sk = sk_const_to_full_sk(sk);
 	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[XFRM_POLICY_OUT]) {
 		num_pols = 1;
-		pols[0] = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl);
+		pols[0] = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl, family);
 		err = xfrm_expand_policies(fl, family, pols,
 					   &num_pols, &num_xfrms);
 		if (err < 0)
@@ -2532,7 +2531,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	pol = NULL;
 	sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk);
 	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir]) {
-		pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl);
+		pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl, family);
 		if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
 			XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINPOLERROR);
 			return 0;
-- 
1.9.1