netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Updates for Marvell Switch SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:38:32 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Updates for Marvell Switch SoCs

Hi Gregory,

On 08/03/17 06:10, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>  On jeu., févr. 16 2017, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> Shortly after I posted my last series I got access to a more recent
>> Marvell SDK which had some device tree support for the switch SoCs I'd
>> been wanting. It was still based on an older kernel but it was a huge
>> improvement over what came before.
>>
>> Patch 1/6 is a typo I noticed after my initial series was applied.
>>
>> Patch 2/6 is a bit of a cleanup. I did initially struggle with how to
>> access individual parts of the DFX block as well as retaining a handle on
>> the entire thing for the switch driver to use.
>>
>> Patch 3/6 is a re-jig of the dtsi files which is needed by 5/6. This is
>> required because I need to use the coreclk label on a different node. It
>> also means I don't have to disable nodes for blocks that only exist on
>> the Armada-XP.
>>
>> Patch 4/6, 5/6 are split from the previous versions.
>>
>> Patch 6/6 is the device tree portion of a change already in clk-next.
>
>
> I applied patches 2, 3 and 6 on mvebu/dt with the acked-by from Rob when
> he gave it.
>
> Patch 1 is already part of 4.11-rc1.
>
> For patch 4 and 5 I understand that either we don't need it or it should
> be a updated version so I skipped them.
>

That's correct, thanks.