lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:38:32 +0000 From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Updates for Marvell Switch SoCs Hi Gregory, On 08/03/17 06:10, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On jeu., févr. 16 2017, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote: > >> Shortly after I posted my last series I got access to a more recent >> Marvell SDK which had some device tree support for the switch SoCs I'd >> been wanting. It was still based on an older kernel but it was a huge >> improvement over what came before. >> >> Patch 1/6 is a typo I noticed after my initial series was applied. >> >> Patch 2/6 is a bit of a cleanup. I did initially struggle with how to >> access individual parts of the DFX block as well as retaining a handle on >> the entire thing for the switch driver to use. >> >> Patch 3/6 is a re-jig of the dtsi files which is needed by 5/6. This is >> required because I need to use the coreclk label on a different node. It >> also means I don't have to disable nodes for blocks that only exist on >> the Armada-XP. >> >> Patch 4/6, 5/6 are split from the previous versions. >> >> Patch 6/6 is the device tree portion of a change already in clk-next. > > > I applied patches 2, 3 and 6 on mvebu/dt with the acked-by from Rob when > he gave it. > > Patch 1 is already part of 4.11-rc1. > > For patch 4 and 5 I understand that either we don't need it or it should > be a updated version so I skipped them. > That's correct, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists