[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91fd8533-20ef-555b-f8cf-deeeef946e59@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:47:33 -0800
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rds: ib: drop unnecessary rdma_reject
On 3/8/2017 11:26 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> When rdma_accept fails, rdma_reject is called in it. As such, it is
> not necessary to execute rdma_reject again.
>
> Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
> ---
> net/rds/ib_cm.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_cm.c b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> index ce3775a..eca3d5f 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> @@ -677,8 +677,7 @@ int rds_ib_cm_handle_connect(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
> event->param.conn.initiator_depth);
>
> /* rdma_accept() calls rdma_reject() internally if it fails */
> - err = rdma_accept(cm_id, &conn_param);
> - if (err)
> + if (rdma_accept(cm_id, &conn_param))
> rds_ib_conn_error(conn, "rdma_accept failed (%d)\n", err);
>
There are couple of consumer reject reasons needs to be conveyed.
Current code don't pass them, but downstream code has them and
hence I kept the code as is. Its good to avoid the reject on
current code so am fine with the change.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists