netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] mlx4: order-0 allocations and page recycling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170309.095210.944048430889793477.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:52:10 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     tariqt@...lanox.com
Cc:     edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...lanox.com,
        willemb@...gle.com, brouer@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/13] mlx4: order-0 allocations and page
 recycling

From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:53:18 +0200

> 
> 
> On 09/03/2017 4:26 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> I was preparing this series for submission as well.
>>> You got it done first :)
>>>
>>> Thanks for re-submitting.
>>> I am Acking the patches now.
>>
>> I believe you also could have added a single Ack on this cover,
>> instead of one ack per element in the series.
> 
> I wasn't sure this is possible, I think patchworks doesn't recognize
> it.
> Dave, does this work?

If you ACK the cover letter, I add that ACK to the merge commit
for the patch series.  It is semantically equivalent to ACK'ing
the entire series.