[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58C1D305.8090802@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:11:17 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
ast@...com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net/bpf] 3051bf36c2 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
at 0000a7cf
On 03/09/2017 11:07 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:55:47PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Can you make that:
>>
>> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_PGE);
>>
>> and see if it fixes your issue?
>
> Hmm, in reading the thread a bit more, that might not work. If I see it
> correctly, lguest does
>
> clear_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_PGE);
>
> after the alternatives have run and static_cpu_has() sites have already
> been patched so clearing that bit won't bring anything.
Yeah, I just tried that out and it had no effect unfortunately, the
static_cpu_has() was still 1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists