[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170310152651.GB1850@nanopsycho.lan>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:26:51 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinan Gunawardena <dinan.gunawardena@...ronome.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 1/2] flow dissector: ND support
Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:20:21PM CET, simon.horman@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:19:13PM CET, simon.horman@...ronome.com wrote:
>> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:37:34AM CET, simon.horman@...ronome.com wrote:
>> >> >Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
>> >> >destination link-layer addresses for neighbour solicitation and
>> >> >advertisement messages.
>> >> >
>> >> >Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
>> >> >---
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> >@@ -633,6 +702,18 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>> >> > FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ICMP,
>> >> > target_container);
>> >> > key_icmp->icmp = skb_flow_get_be16(skb, nhoff, data, hlen);
>> >> >+
>> >> >+ if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ND) &&
>> >> >+ ip_proto == IPPROTO_IPV6 && key_icmp->code == 0 &&
>> >>
>> >> IPPROTO_IPV6 say "IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnelling". Please use "NEXTHDR_IPV6"
>> >> instead.
>> >
>> >Thanks, will do.
>> >
>> >> >+ (key_icmp->type == NDISC_NEIGHBOUR_SOLICITATION ||
>> >> >+ key_icmp->type == NDISC_NEIGHBOUR_ADVERTISEMENT)) {
>> >> >+ key_nd = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
>> >> >+ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ND,
>> >> >+ target_container);
>> >> >+ if (!(skb_flow_dissect_nd(skb, key_nd, data, nhoff,
>> >> >+ hlen, ipv6_payload_len)))
>> >> >+ goto out_bad;
>> >> >+ }
>> >>
>> >> You should put this under "switch (ip_proto) {"
>> >
>> >I see that makes sense in terms of the check against ip_proto.
>> >But I added it here to allow checking against key_icmp->code
>> >and key_icmp->type as well.
>>
>> Sure. Just add under "switch (ip_proto) {" and call a wrapper nd
>> function from there. In that function, you check dissector_uses_key and
>> other needed things.
>
>Sorry, but I'm still a little unclear on how that interacts with
>the dissection of key_icmp.
you do:
if (key_icmp->code != 0)
return
Inside that function. Or something like that. Up to you. Just look at
__skb_flow_dissect_arp for example. First it checks dissector_uses_key,
then it does other checks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists