lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL2PR07MB23065C5592BE9E8FF987717E8D200@BL2PR07MB2306.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:44:05 +0000
From:   "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Tayar, Tomer" <Tomer.Tayar@...ium.com>,
        "Amrani, Ram" <Ram.Amrani@...ium.com>,
        "Rangankar, Manish" <Manish.Rangankar@...ium.com>,
        "Dupuis, Chad" <Chad.Dupuis@...ium.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] qed*: Utilize Firmware 8.15.3.0

> We can't just require a new firmware version in the driver, as users most
> likely won't have it by the time they install the new kernel.  So you'll have to
> support the old firmware version as well.

Why not? That has been the paradigm forever.

The new firmware version is already available in linux-firmware.
In any reasonable distro that would update the driver, you'd expect
they'd also update the firmware version on their filesystem.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ