netdev - Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] rds: ib: drop unnecessary rdma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58C63F06.6090804@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:41:10 +0800
From:   Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] rds: ib: drop unnecessary rdma_reject



On 2017/3/13 14:32, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:43:45AM -0400, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> When rdma_accept fails, rdma_reject is called in it. As such, it is
>> not necessary to execute rdma_reject again.
> It is not always correct, according to the code, rdma_accept can fail
> and will return EINVAL and skip calling to rdma_reject.
Sure. When -EINVAL is returned, By this function cma_comp(id_priv, 
RDMA_CM_CONNECT), the connection
is lost. As such, it does not matter whether sending rdma_reject or not.

Zhu Yanjun
>
> 3725 int rdma_accept(struct rdma_cm_id *id, struct rdma_conn_param *conn_param)
> 3726 {
> 3727         struct rdma_id_private *id_priv;
> 3728         int ret;
> 3729
> 3730         id_priv = container_of(id, struct rdma_id_private, id);
> 3731
> 3732         id_priv->owner = task_pid_nr(current);
> 3733
> 3734         if (!cma_comp(id_priv, RDMA_CM_CONNECT))
> 3735                 return -EINVAL;
> 3736
>
>
>> Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
>> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
>> ---
>>   net/rds/ib_cm.c | 5 ++---
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_cm.c b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
>> index ce3775a..4b9405c 100644
>> --- a/net/rds/ib_cm.c
>> +++ b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
>> @@ -677,9 +677,8 @@ int rds_ib_cm_handle_connect(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
>>   		event->param.conn.initiator_depth);
>>
>>   	/* rdma_accept() calls rdma_reject() internally if it fails */
>> -	err = rdma_accept(cm_id, &conn_param);
>> -	if (err)
>> -		rds_ib_conn_error(conn, "rdma_accept failed (%d)\n", err);
>> +	if (rdma_accept(cm_id, &conn_param))
>> +		rds_ib_conn_error(conn, "rdma_accept failed\n");
>>
>>   out:
>>   	if (conn)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>