[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170313091430.GA17847@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:14:30 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/4] update ipvs sysctl document
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>
> > Fix and add some new ipvs sysctl options. Also use tab instead of
> > whitespaces to indent the descriptions.
> >
> > V2: Fix some descriptions based on Julian's advice.
> >
> > Hangbin Liu (4):
> > ipvs: fix sync_threshold description and add sync_refresh_period, sync_retries
> > ipvs: Document sysctl sync_qlen_max and sync_sock_size
> > ipvs: Document sysctl sync_ports
> > ipvs: Document sysctl pmtu_disc
>
> All patches look ok to me, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
>
> Simon, can we keep this patchset while in merge window?
Hi,
I apologise for the extended delay in dealing with this - I have been ill.
I have queued these up for v4.12 in ipvs-next as that seems to be the most
appropriate course of action at this time. Please let me know if you'd like
to explore a different approach.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists