netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net-next: dsa: add Mediatek tag RX/TX handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8760jcger5.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:38:22 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, Landen.Chao@...iatek.com, keyhaede@...il.com,
        objelf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net-next: dsa: add Mediatek tag RX/TX handler

Hi Sean,

Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com> writes:

>> This won't apply, the port index in now stored in p->dp->index.
>
> It seems that I need to upgrade to newer kernel to verify this

Correct. In fact every time you send patches to net-next (or any other
subsystem branch), you must rebase your patch series onto the latest
version of that tree, in order to avoid eventuel conflicts.

Thanks,

        Vivien