netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] gtp: support multiple APN's per GTP endpoint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170314134216.GA4170@salvia>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:42:16 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Andreas Schultz <aschultz@...p.net>
Cc:     laforge <laforge@...monks.org>,
        osmocom-net-gprs <osmocom-net-gprs@...ts.osmocom.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lionel Gauthier <Lionel.Gauthier@...ecom.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] gtp: support multiple APN's per GTP endpoint

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
> > It is definitely not acceptable to break the existing API.
> 
> The specific use case of the API that is no longer supported was never used by
> anyone. [...]

Yes, this was used openggsn and I tested this with a full blown FOSS
setup. Yes, a toy thing compared to the proprietary equipment you deal
with, but we always started with things like this.

> The only supported and documented API for the GTP module is libgtpnl.

No, the netlink interface itself if the API.

Stopping trying to find a reason to break API, that is a no-go.