| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CADvbK_fr5dis-X8znOtjDFqFrDWcK+RcDD8rz=oNidrJJ1h0+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:35:33 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [4.10+] sctp lockdep trace
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
<marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:10:45PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 05:21:10PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>> > [ 244.251557] ===============================
>> > [ 244.263321] [ ERR: suspicious RCU usage. ]
>> > [ 244.274982] 4.10.0-think+ #7 Not tainted
>> > [ 244.286511] -------------------------------
>> > [ 244.298008] ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:602 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>> > [ 244.309665]
>> > other info that might help us debug this:
>> >
>> > [ 244.344629]
>> > rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>> > [ 244.367839] 1 lock held by trinity-c30/1781:
>> > [ 244.379481] #0:
>> > [ 244.390848] (
>> > [ 244.402372] sk_lock-AF_INET
>> > [ 244.413825] ){+.+.+.}
>> > [ 244.425231] , at: [<ffffffffa0302fd0>] sctp_sendmsg+0x330/0xfe0 [sctp]
>> > [ 244.436774]
>> > stack backtrace:
>> > [ 244.459620] CPU: 3 PID: 1781 Comm: trinity-c30 Not tainted 4.10.0-think+ #7
>> > [ 244.482790] Call Trace:
>> > [ 244.494201] dump_stack+0x68/0x93
>> > [ 244.505598] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xce/0xf0
>> > [ 244.516924] sctp_hash_transport+0x406/0x7e0 [sctp]
>> > [ 244.528137] ? sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv+0x171/0x290 [sctp]
>> > [ 244.539243] sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x290/0x3c0 [sctp]
>> > [ 244.550291] sctp_sendmsg+0x8f7/0xfe0 [sctp]
>> > [ 244.561258] ? rw_copy_check_uvector+0x8e/0x190
>> > [ 244.572308] ? import_iovec+0x3a/0xe0
>> > [ 244.583232] inet_sendmsg+0x49/0x1e0
>> > [ 244.594150] ___sys_sendmsg+0x2d4/0x300
>> > [ 244.605002] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>> > [ 244.615844] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>> > [ 244.626533] ? get_lock_stats+0x19/0x50
>> > [ 244.637141] __sys_sendmsg+0x54/0x90
>> > [ 244.647817] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
>> > [ 244.658400] do_syscall_64+0x66/0x1d0
>> > [ 244.668990] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
>> > [ 244.679582] RIP: 0033:0x7fe095fcb0f9
>> > [ 244.690079] RSP: 002b:00007ffc5601b1d8 EFLAGS: 00000246
>> > [ 244.700704] ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
>> > [ 244.711248] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000002e RCX: 00007fe095fcb0f9
>> > [ 244.721818] RDX: 0000000000000080 RSI: 00005592de12ddc0 RDI: 000000000000012d
>> > [ 244.732282] RBP: 00007fe0965c8000 R08: 000000000000c000 R09: 00000000000000dc
>> > [ 244.742576] R10: 0003021200000088 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
>> > [ 244.752804] R13: 00007fe0965c8048 R14: 00007fe0966a1ad8 R15: 00007fe0965c8000
>> >
>> > [ 244.775549] ===============================
>> > [ 244.785875] [ ERR: suspicious RCU usage. ]
>> > [ 244.796951] 4.10.0-think+ #7 Not tainted
>> > [ 244.807185] -------------------------------
>> > [ 244.819213] ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:605 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>> > [ 244.829420]
>> > other info that might help us debug this:
>> >
>> > [ 244.859963]
>> > rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>> > [ 244.879766] 1 lock held by trinity-c30/1781:
>> > [ 244.889953] #0:
>> > [ 244.900000] (
>> > [ 244.909854] sk_lock-AF_INET
>> > [ 244.919645] ){+.+.+.}
>> > [ 244.929238] , at: [<ffffffffa0302fd0>] sctp_sendmsg+0x330/0xfe0 [sctp]
>> > [ 244.939167]
>> > stack backtrace:
>> > [ 244.958506] CPU: 3 PID: 1781 Comm: trinity-c30 Not tainted 4.10.0-think+ #7
>> > [ 244.978102] Call Trace:
>> > [ 244.987735] dump_stack+0x68/0x93
>> > [ 244.997112] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xce/0xf0
>> > [ 245.006588] sctp_hash_transport+0x4ca/0x7e0 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.016264] ? sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv+0x171/0x290 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.025797] sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x290/0x3c0 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.035380] sctp_sendmsg+0x8f7/0xfe0 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.044883] ? rw_copy_check_uvector+0x8e/0x190
>> > [ 245.054464] ? import_iovec+0x3a/0xe0
>> > [ 245.064016] inet_sendmsg+0x49/0x1e0
>> > [ 245.073516] ___sys_sendmsg+0x2d4/0x300
>> > [ 245.082967] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>> > [ 245.092448] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>> > [ 245.101850] ? get_lock_stats+0x19/0x50
>> > [ 245.111170] __sys_sendmsg+0x54/0x90
>> > [ 245.120451] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
>> > [ 245.129649] do_syscall_64+0x66/0x1d0
>> > [ 245.138783] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
>> > [ 245.147678] RIP: 0033:0x7fe095fcb0f9
>> > [ 245.156588] RSP: 002b:00007ffc5601b1d8 EFLAGS: 00000246
>> > [ 245.165503] ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
>> > [ 245.174601] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000002e RCX: 00007fe095fcb0f9
>> > [ 245.183861] RDX: 0000000000000080 RSI: 00005592de12ddc0 RDI: 000000000000012d
>> > [ 245.193038] RBP: 00007fe0965c8000 R08: 000000000000c000 R09: 00000000000000dc
>> > [ 245.202214] R10: 0003021200000088 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
>> > [ 245.211261] R13: 00007fe0965c8048 R14: 00007fe0966a1ad8 R15: 00007fe0965c8000
>> >
>> > [ 245.308216] ===============================
>> > [ 245.317295] [ ERR: suspicious RCU usage. ]
>> > [ 245.327876] 4.10.0-think+ #7 Not tainted
>> > [ 245.337065] -------------------------------
>> > [ 245.345840] ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:616 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>> > [ 245.356501]
>> > other info that might help us debug this:
>> >
>> > [ 245.382185]
>> > rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>> > [ 245.399415] 1 lock held by trinity-c30/1781:
>> > [ 245.408138] #0:
>> > [ 245.416594] (
>> > [ 245.424928] sk_lock-AF_INET
>> > [ 245.433279] ){+.+.+.}
>> > [ 245.441889] , at: [<ffffffffa0302fd0>] sctp_sendmsg+0x330/0xfe0 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.450167]
>> > stack backtrace:
>> > [ 245.466352] CPU: 3 PID: 1781 Comm: trinity-c30 Not tainted 4.10.0-think+ #7
>> > [ 245.482894] Call Trace:
>> > [ 245.491096] dump_stack+0x68/0x93
>> > [ 245.499314] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xce/0xf0
>> > [ 245.507610] sctp_hash_transport+0x6c0/0x7e0 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.515972] ? sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv+0x171/0x290 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.524366] sctp_assoc_add_peer+0x290/0x3c0 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.532736] sctp_sendmsg+0x8f7/0xfe0 [sctp]
>> > [ 245.541040] ? rw_copy_check_uvector+0x8e/0x190
>> > [ 245.549402] ? import_iovec+0x3a/0xe0
>> > [ 245.557679] inet_sendmsg+0x49/0x1e0
>> > [ 245.565887] ___sys_sendmsg+0x2d4/0x300
>> > [ 245.574092] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>> > [ 245.582342] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
>> > [ 245.590508] ? get_lock_stats+0x19/0x50
>> > [ 245.598641] __sys_sendmsg+0x54/0x90
>> > [ 245.606745] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
>> > [ 245.614784] do_syscall_64+0x66/0x1d0
>> > [ 245.622828] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
>> > [ 245.630894] RIP: 0033:0x7fe095fcb0f9
>> > [ 245.638962] RSP: 002b:00007ffc5601b1d8 EFLAGS: 00000246
>> > [ 245.647071] ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
>> > [ 245.655186] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000002e RCX: 00007fe095fcb0f9
>> > [ 245.663435] RDX: 0000000000000080 RSI: 00005592de12ddc0 RDI: 000000000000012d
>> > [ 245.671776] RBP: 00007fe0965c8000 R08: 000000000000c000 R09: 00000000000000dc
>> > [ 245.680111] R10: 0003021200000088 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
>> > [ 245.688460] R13: 00007fe0965c8048 R14: 00007fe0966a1ad8 R15: 00007fe0965c8000
>> >
>>
>> Cc'ing Xin and linux-sctp@ mailing list.
>
> Seems the same as Andrey Konovalov had reported?
>
I would think so, this patch has fixed it:
commit 5179b26694c92373275e4933f5d0ff32d585c675
Author: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date: Tue Feb 28 12:41:29 2017 +0800
sctp: call rcu_read_lock before checking for duplicate transport nodes
not sure which commit your tests are based on, Dave, can you
check if this fix has been in your test kernel?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists