[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170315162257.127b27d6@griffin>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:22:57 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...essinduktion.org, pshelar@....org,
aduyck@...antis.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vxlan: allow multiple VXLANs with same VNI
for IPv6 link-local addresses
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:29:29 +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> While ensuring that the destination address is link-local iff the source
> address is would also be an option, it didn't seem too useful as the
> destination address will be a multicast address anyways in "normal" VXLAN
> configurations. If we really want to check this, I guess the valid
> combinations are:
>
> source link-local - destination link-local UC
> source link-local - destination link-local MC
> source global/... - destination global/... UC
> source global/... - destination any MC
>
> Does this make sense?
It does.
Thanks!
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists