[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1489702304.28631.251.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:11:44 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 5/5] epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with
socket fds.
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 11:33 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
> +/*
> + * If busy polling is on and the file is a socket, return a pointer to
> + * struct sock
> + */
> +static inline struct sock *ep_sk_from_file(struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> +
> + if (!S_ISSOCK(inode->i_mode))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return ((struct socket *)file->private_data)->sk;
> +}
I believe a more standard way is to use sock_from_file()
(This does not have to fetch a cache line to read i_mode ))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists