netdev - [net-next 02/13] igb: Use length to determine if descriptor is done

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170317195818.74912-3-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:58:07 -0700
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        jogreene@...hat.com, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 02/13] igb: Use length to determine if descriptor is done

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>

This change makes it so that we use the length of the packet instead of the
DD status bit to determine if a new descriptor is ready to be processed.
The obvious advantage is that it cuts down on reads as we don't really even
need the DD bit if going from a 0 to a non-zero value on size is enough to
inform us that the packet has been completed.

In addition I have updated the code so that we only reset the Rx descriptor
length for descriptor zero when resetting a ring instead of having to do a
memset with 0 over the entire ring.  By doing this we can save some time on
initialization.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c |  2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c    | 14 ++++++++------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
index 737b664d004c..3f5f7744c90f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
@@ -1811,7 +1811,7 @@ static int igb_clean_test_rings(struct igb_ring *rx_ring,
 	tx_ntc = tx_ring->next_to_clean;
 	rx_desc = IGB_RX_DESC(rx_ring, rx_ntc);
 
-	while (igb_test_staterr(rx_desc, E1000_RXD_STAT_DD)) {
+	while (rx_desc->wb.upper.length) {
 		/* check Rx buffer */
 		rx_buffer_info = &rx_ring->rx_buffer_info[rx_ntc];
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index cf7ee9cdac6f..1d76d3a90a17 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -3720,6 +3720,7 @@ void igb_configure_rx_ring(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
 			   struct igb_ring *ring)
 {
 	struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
+	union e1000_adv_rx_desc *rx_desc;
 	u64 rdba = ring->dma;
 	int reg_idx = ring->reg_idx;
 	u32 srrctl = 0, rxdctl = 0;
@@ -3758,6 +3759,10 @@ void igb_configure_rx_ring(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
 	rxdctl |= IGB_RX_HTHRESH << 8;
 	rxdctl |= IGB_RX_WTHRESH << 16;
 
+	/* initialize Rx descriptor 0 */
+	rx_desc = IGB_RX_DESC(ring, 0);
+	rx_desc->wb.upper.length = 0;
+
 	/* enable receive descriptor fetching */
 	rxdctl |= E1000_RXDCTL_QUEUE_ENABLE;
 	wr32(E1000_RXDCTL(reg_idx), rxdctl);
@@ -3973,9 +3978,6 @@ static void igb_clean_rx_ring(struct igb_ring *rx_ring)
 	size = sizeof(struct igb_rx_buffer) * rx_ring->count;
 	memset(rx_ring->rx_buffer_info, 0, size);
 
-	/* Zero out the descriptor ring */
-	memset(rx_ring->desc, 0, rx_ring->size);
-
 	rx_ring->next_to_alloc = 0;
 	rx_ring->next_to_clean = 0;
 	rx_ring->next_to_use = 0;
@@ -7172,7 +7174,7 @@ static int igb_clean_rx_irq(struct igb_q_vector *q_vector, const int budget)
 
 		rx_desc = IGB_RX_DESC(rx_ring, rx_ring->next_to_clean);
 
-		if (!rx_desc->wb.upper.status_error)
+		if (!rx_desc->wb.upper.length)
 			break;
 
 		/* This memory barrier is needed to keep us from reading
@@ -7312,8 +7314,8 @@ void igb_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igb_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
 			i -= rx_ring->count;
 		}
 
-		/* clear the status bits for the next_to_use descriptor */
-		rx_desc->wb.upper.status_error = 0;
+		/* clear the length for the next_to_use descriptor */
+		rx_desc->wb.upper.length = 0;
 
 		cleaned_count--;
 	} while (cleaned_count);
-- 
2.12.0