[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9545c361-61e2-0d93-c5a6-c0b3837e1c8d@grandegger.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:30:51 +0100
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@...esys.com>,
Akshay Bhat <nodeax@...il.com>
Cc: mkl@...gutronix.de, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] can: spi: hi311x: Add Holt HI-311x CAN driver
Hello Akshay,
Am 17.03.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Akshay Bhat:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On 03/17/2017 01:04 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>
>> Hm, that's unusual. Cable disconnected and then send a message:
>>
>> $ grep /proc/interrupts; sleep 10; /proc/interrupts
>>
>> should make things clear. But maybe it's a clever chip and it does stop
>> sending error messages if the error counter does not change any more.
>> After bus-off, the chip is quiet, of course. Should have a closer look
>> to the CAN standard.
>>
>
> The interrupt count does not increment after device reaches
> tx-error-passive (with cable disconnected).
>
> # while true; do grep -i hi3110 /proc/interrupts; sleep 10; done &
> [1] 793
> #
> 111: 0 0 gpio-mxc 12 Edge hi3110
> # candump -t d -e any,0:0,#FFFFFFF &
> [2] 798
> # cansend can0 123#
> #
> (000.000000) can0 20000004 [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 60 00 ERRORFRAME
> controller-problem{tx-error-warning}
> error-counter-tx-rx{{96}{0}}
> (000.002122) can0 20000004 [8] 00 20 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
> controller-problem{tx-error-passive}
> error-counter-tx-rx{{128}{0}}
> 111: 10 0 gpio-mxc 12 Edge hi3110
> 111: 10 0 gpio-mxc 12 Edge hi3110
> 111: 10 0 gpio-mxc 12 Edge hi3110
OK, then there is no good reason connecting the STAT interrupt pin.
Wolfgang.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists