[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ecd2a27-4f93-2b3f-cb91-c558976973a2@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:25:10 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] ptr_ring: introduce batch dequeuing
Hello!
On 3/21/2017 7:04 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
> index 6c70444..4771ded 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
> @@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct ptr_ring *r)
> return ptr;
> }
>
> +static inline int __ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + void *ptr;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + while (i < n) {
Hm, why not *for*?
> + ptr = __ptr_ring_consume(r);
> + if (!ptr)
> + break;
> + array[i++] = ptr;
> + }
> +
> + return i;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Note: resize (below) nests producer lock within consumer lock, so if you
> * call this in interrupt or BH context, you must disable interrupts/BH when
> @@ -297,6 +313,55 @@ static inline void *ptr_ring_consume_bh(struct ptr_ring *r)
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists