[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170322.124316.224419523899966124.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, woojung.huh@...rochip.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] Clean up PHY MMD accessors
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:35:55 +0000
> This series cleans up phylib's MMD accessors, so that we have a common
> way of accessing the Clause 45 register set.
>
> The current situation is far from ideal - we have phy_(read|write)_mmd()
> which accesses Clause 45 registers over Clause 45 accesses, and we have
> phy_(read|write)_mmd_indirect(), which accesses Clause 45 registers via
> Clause 22 register 13/14.
>
> Generic code uses the indirect methods to access standard Clause 45
> features, and when we come to add Clause 45 PHY support to phylib, we
> would need to make these conditional upon the PHY type, or duplicate
> these functions.
>
> An alternative solution is to merge these accessors together, and select
> the appropriate access method depending upon the 802.3 clause that the
> PHY conforms with. The result is that we have a single set of
> phy_(read|write)_mmd() accessors.
>
> For cases which require special handling, we still allow PHY drivers to
> override all MMD accesses - except rather than just overriding the
> indirect accesses. This keeps existing overrides working.
>
> Combining the two also has another beneficial side effect - we get rid
> of similar functions that take arguments in different orders. The
> old direct accessors took the phy structure, devad and register number,
> whereas the indirect accessors took the phy structure, register number
> and devad in that order. Care must be taken when updating future
> drivers that the argument order is correct, and the function name is
> not merely replaced.
>
> This patch set is against net-next.
Series applied, thanks Russell.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists