netdev - [PATCH net-next 01/15] nfp: disallow sharing mutexes on the same machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170322005921.10965-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:59:07 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     oss-drivers@...ronome.com, kubakici@...pl,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/15] nfp: disallow sharing mutexes on the same machine

NFP can be connected to multiple machines via PCI or other buses.
Access to hardware resources is arbitrated using locks residing
in device memory.  Currently nfpcore only respects the mutexes
when it comes to inter-host locking, but if we try to acquire
the same lock again, on one host - it will simply return success
because owner of the lock is already set to that host.

This makes the locks useless for arbitration within one host
and unfair because whichever host grabbed the lock will have
a chance to reacquire it without others getting a shot.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c
index 40108e66c654..e2267b421af0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c
@@ -1736,11 +1736,5 @@ int nfp_cpp_mutex_trylock(struct nfp_cpp_mutex *mutex)
 		return 0;
 	}

-	/* Already locked by us? Success! */
-	if (tmp == value) {
-		mutex->depth = 1;
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	return nfp_mutex_is_locked(tmp) ? -EBUSY : -EINVAL;
 }
-- 
2.11.0