[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170323225309.GC31372@avx2>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 01:53:09 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: use "unsigned int" in __xfrm6_pref_hash()
x86_64 is zero-extending arch so "unsigned int" is preferred over "int"
for address calculations.
Space savings:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-58 (-58)
function old new delta
xfrm_hash_resize 2752 2743 -9
policy_hash_bysel 985 973 -12
policy_hash_direct 1036 999 -37
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_hash.h
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ static inline unsigned int __xfrm4_dpref_spref_hash(const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
static inline unsigned int __xfrm6_pref_hash(const xfrm_address_t *addr,
__u8 prefixlen)
{
- int pdw;
- int pbi;
+ unsigned int pdw;
+ unsigned int pbi;
u32 initval = 0;
pdw = prefixlen >> 5; /* num of whole u32 in prefix */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists