[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170324105549.34b3e778@griffin>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:48 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Denny Page <dennypage@...com>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Extending socket timestamping API for NTP
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:08:00 -0700, Denny Page wrote:
> I am very surprised at this. The application caching approach
> requires the application retrieve the value via a system call. The
> system call overhead is huge in comparison to everything else. More
> importantly, the application cached value may be wrong. If the
> application takes a sample every 5 seconds, there are 5 seconds of
> timestamps that can be wildly wrong.
You can add a netlink event that is sent on speed change. No need for
polling then and the wrong timestamp window will be very tiny. (It
can't be zero, even with per-packet data.)
ethtool needs to be converted to netlink, anyway.
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists