netdev - Re: [v2,net-next,1/3] net: stmmac: enable multiple buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170324111736.GB22281@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:17:36 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2,net-next,1/3] net: stmmac: enable multiple buffers

> Yes it would be fantastic to have a set of boards, but I rarely see this in any
> maintainer :).

Being a Marvell SoC and switch maintainer, i have around a dozen
boards. Some i got some simply by asking the manufacture, others i
purchased. I don't think i'm in the minority here. Without having
access to a number of different hardwares, i don't feel i would be
doing my work properly.

> I try as hard as I can to network with people and try to minimize this
> situations, but when there is so many different setups using a driver with diff
> configurations, situations like this can happen, but I am here to help debugging
> and solving them.

You made a move to rename stmmac to synopsys not long ago. It gave the
impression that synopsis wants to take over this driver. If there are
a number of different configurations, who better than synopsys to
actually properly test these configurations? If you ask around, i'm
sure people will send you hardware.

     Andrew