[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B626503F4598@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:12:37 +0000
From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"jogreene@...hat.com" <jogreene@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 05/11] i40e: fix for queue timing delays
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 8:01 PM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Cc: Wyborny, Carolyn <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; nhorman@...hat.com; sassmann@...hat.com;
> jogreene@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [net-next 05/11] i40e: fix for queue timing delays
>
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:12:59 -0700
>
> > From: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a delay to Rx queue disables to accommodate HW needs.
> >
[..]
> > + /* HW needs up to 50ms to finish RX queue disable*/
> > + mdelay(50);
>
> You just polled a register which indicates that the request is finished.
> Needing futher time for the operation to complete doesn't make any
> sense.
>
> If this is really needed, you need to explain in the commit message, in
> detail, what is really the problem here.
>
> THanks.
It's a hw limitation, will submit an updated patch with more detail.
Thanks,
Carolyn
Carolyn Wyborny
Linux Development
Networking Division
Intel Corporation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists