[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170327180203.GB29050@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:02:06 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eyal Perry <eyalpe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool] ethtool: Support for configurable RSS hash
function
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 02:50:47PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:03:51 +0200, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > This ethtool patch adds support to set and get the current RSS hash
> > function for the device through the new hfunc mask field in the
> > ethtool_rxfh struct. Kernel supported hash function names are queried
> > with ETHTOOL_GSTRINGS - each string is corresponding with a bit in hfunc
> > mask according to its index in the string-set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eyal Perry <eyalpe@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>
> Hi John,
>
> It seems you have applied both my earlier patch with get support and
> this:
>
> adbaa18b9bc1 ("ethtool: Support for configurable RSS hash function")
> b932835d2302 ("ethtool: print hash function with ethtool -x|--show-rxfh-indir")
>
> Now we print the RSS function twice:
>
> RX flow hash indirection table for em4 with 4 RX ring(s):
> 0: [...]
> RSS hash function: toeplitz <--- from my adbaa18b9bc1
> RSS hash key:
> Operation not supported
> RSS hash function: <--- from this patch
> toeplitz: on
> xor: off
> crc32: off
>
> Reverting my patch is probably the easiest way forward, although I find
> it more concise and easier to parse in test scripts :)
Thanks for pointing-out this issue! I apologize for my own confusion.
As you suggest, I will be reverting your patch.
Thanks,
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists