netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: fix number of tx queues in stmmac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4813594-191b-d374-27da-6c87b1c72e3e@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:12:02 +0100
From:   Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        <alexandre.torgue@...com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: fix number of tx queues in
 stmmac_poll

Às 10:09 AM de 3/27/2017, Corentin Labbe escreveu:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:04:57AM +0100, Joao Pinto wrote:
>> Às 7:26 AM de 3/25/2017, Corentin Labbe escreveu:
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:16:45PM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote:
>>>> For cores that have more than 1 TX queue configured, the kernel would crash,
>>>> since only one TX queue is permitted by default.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>>> index 3827952..1eab084 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>>> @@ -3429,7 +3429,7 @@ static int stmmac_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>>>>  	struct stmmac_rx_queue *rx_q =
>>>>  		container_of(napi, struct stmmac_rx_queue, napi);
>>>>  	struct stmmac_priv *priv = rx_q->priv_data;
>>>> -	u32 tx_count = priv->dma_cap.number_tx_queues;
>>>> +	u32 tx_count = priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use;
>>>>  	u32 chan = rx_q->queue_index;
>>>>  	u32 work_done = 0;
>>>>  	u32 queue = 0;
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.9.3
>>>>
>>>
>>> This patch fix the performance issue on dwmac-sun8i only.
>>
>> Ok, great!
>>
> 
> Sorry, in the we, I see that my gigabit dwmac-sun8i didnt work... (but didnt have time to find why).
> 
>>> The dwmac-sunxi is still broken.

Ok, let's see what others report.

>>>
>>
>> What is the difference between the setups?
> 
> dwmac-sun8i use chain mode, dwmac-sunxi use ring mode
> 

@Thierry and Niklas: Hi! Your setup is working well with these 2 fix patches?

Thnaks.