[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee068d94-9a4e-404e-1348-c8e412c58ec9@axis.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:10:43 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...s.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
<clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>, <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
<alexandre.torgue@...com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: stmmac: Always use the number of configured TX
queues
On 03/28/2017 03:57 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> Even if hardware supports multiple queues, software can choose to only
> use a subset of them. Make sure we never try to access uninitialized
> queues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 106ace3781b3..ec5bba85c529 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -3423,7 +3423,7 @@ static int stmmac_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> struct stmmac_rx_queue *rx_q =
> container_of(napi, struct stmmac_rx_queue, napi);
> struct stmmac_priv *priv = rx_q->priv_data;
> - u32 tx_count = priv->dma_cap.number_tx_queues;
> + u32 tx_count = priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use;
> u32 chan = rx_q->queue_index;
> u32 work_done = 0;
> u32 queue = 0;
>
Thanks Thierry,
but this look like an equivalent patch to Joao's
"net: stmmac: fix number of tx queues in stmmac_poll"
which I already used during bisecting to avoid random
crashes in stmmac_tx_clean.
Have you noticed random RX brokenness after boot in
recent linux-next tags?
It feels like it might trigger more often after a
cold boot, but that could just be my brain seeing
patterns that aren't really there :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists