netdev - Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHgaXd+4QkFxnt-_iCqH8AyCN_Y8gXwr+y=iugz38NKSWspsbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:19:54 +0530
From:   Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit

Thanks David. It helped a lot.

Hi Daniel,

Do you have any document to understand the working of tail calls? I
looked at your presentations but it seemed confusing to me. Anything
simple would be great, just about the tail calls. I don't think I need
examples, I can get them from your presentations. I just need a very
general idea. May be you know the code in kernel where it is
implemented.
Thanks for the help Daniel.

Best,
Shubham Bansal


On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:25 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:43:44 +0530
>
>>> You can't truncate, but you'll have to build 64-bit ops using 32-bit registers.
>>
>> A small example would help a lot.
>
> You can simply perform 64-bit operations in C code and see what gcc
> outputs for that code on this 32-bit target.