[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnbY+e0to_bkJd4L5fB7QZ9sswkmgK2Fr2NGZ__EhoH77foTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:45:50 +1100
From: Daurnimator <quae@...rnimator.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
William Ahern <william@...handclement.com>,
"Santi T." <santitm99@...il.com>,
Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: EINVAL when using connect() for udp sockets
On 29 March 2017 at 10:44, Daurnimator <quae@...rnimator.com> wrote:
> This should probably incorrect behaviour and should the operation
> should succeed.
Uh, not sure why there are so many "should"s in that message.
This is probably incorrect behaviour and the operation should succeed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists